[Note: Much of the following blog was posted on WND.com as a commentary on 10/22/12 with important additions in commentary (see my next post). I looked deeper into Obama’s confession in the second presidential debate.]
Obama’s first presidential debate with Romney gave us another look deep into his mind—into a continued confession which he simply cannot stop himself from making.
From my experience as a forensic profiler I know when a guilty person starts to break. Law enforcement describes how guilty suspects show signs of cracking during an interrogation—and they push on those weaknesses. We can view Obama’s poor performance during the first presidential debate with Romney on October 3, 2012 in a similar way. The debate—a symbolic interrogation— was the first time Obama had faced tough questions since 2008.
And he showed signs of cracking.
Consider the following. As a forensic profiler I listened in a neutral fashion to key Obama communications around the time of his 2008 election. I explain my method of reading between the lines— where people always confess— in my recent book, “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury.” I demonstrated how, driven by secret guilt, Obama confessed in a powerful way to violating the Constitution, running as an illegal foreign-born president which was just the tip of the iceberg of his misguided rage directed at America. (He also provided the massive personal wounds and stark hidden terror which prompts his anger.)
Additionally, I showed how in recent communications Obama’s unconscious guilt is off the charts. Running for reelection has especially triggered his misdeeds in a fresh way. Again he is trying to pull the wool over America’s eyes with plans for more disguised fury directed at our nation.
This I believe is how we can ultimately understand his poor presidential debate—deep seated powerful guilt. Obama was a “no show,” he kept looking down. He could not look America in the eye. Frequently he never answered Romney allowing him to dominate. “Obama fell apart every time Romney made a substantive point,” journalist Joseph Farah noted.
All in all we have a behavioral confession, “I do not belong in this office.” A non-verbal confession of his illegal presidency.
All along Obama has told us a major key to understanding him is read his behavior (as commentator Charles Krauthammer has also observed). Remember Obama stressed in his 2008 Fathers’ Day speech as a candidate how absent fathers produced sons who attacked community foundations just as they did. He talked about how sons of absent fathers repeated the destructive behavior of the father. Clearly he made plain his father was absent in his scathing criticism of absent fathers.
The day following the debate in a speech Obama insisted Romney “ought to tell the people the truth” and wasn’t during the debate. Unconsciously Obama points to his own enormous guilt and tremendous deception of the people. This also harkens back to his hidden confession in his inaugural address with numerous images suggesting an ineligible president: taking shortcuts, back-room deals that violate trust, and clinging “to power through corruption and deceit and the silencing of dissent.” Obama repeatedly shows us how his brilliant unconscious—the honest super intelligence we all possess—eventually confesses in words that match his behavior.
Regarding the first debate, several key commentators including Joseph Farah theorized that some powerful integrity issue among Obama donors was greatly distracting him. But Farah suggests he intuitively picked up on the deepest integrity reason as his column (10/4/12) showed. He observed Obama falling apart beyond belief. He noted Obama “grew increasingly uneasy, nervous….an inability to think clearly on his feet.” Farah underscored an extreme deficit in Obama’s “executive capabilities.” (All these are signs of cracking.) He raises the key question “why are we seeing this now?”
Then Farah intuitively makes the crucial connection. He emphasizes that Obama was never challenged as a candidate and then among the issues he points to Obama’s great crime, “never screened for constitutional eligibility.” Unconsciously Farah realizes the truth—such a major offense would mean enormous guilt deep down.
Consider that Obama’s unconscious super intelligence was posing the toughest question of all by his behavior and poor performance, “Have those of you who missed my secret confession and lack of media vetting ever seriously asked if I am a legal president, if I belong in office?” In short a hidden confession. Obama demonstrates the power of the unconscious super intelligence to have its way and how the conscious mind is no match for someone who must confess.
As anticipated Obama’s second debate performance on October 16, 2012 was overtly much different than his first. He appeared more assertive and having regained his wits. This makes his first debate performance even more clearly a behavioral confession that he was not a legally qualified president. We can appreciate even further how he simply—despite adequate coaching—was overpowered by a guilty conscience at that time. Likely this was the clearest view we will get in the three debates of the heavy burden which weighs him down. Still, never underestimate the power of the unconscious mind to get its messages across.
See recent YouTube series “The Obama Confession” by Dr. Hodges