Exclusive: Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., decodes deeper meaning of Obama’s claim about Hillary emails
“Nobody is above the law. How many times do I have to say it?”
– Barack Obama, April 10, 2016
In learning how to decode Obama’s unconscious super-intelligence mind, we find another blatant example of denial. During an interview with Fox News that aired April 10, 2016, Barack Obama commented on the possible security threat posed by Hillary Clinton’s emails and on the possibility he could influence the ongoing investigation.
He declared, in a classic string of denials, “I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department or the FBI – not just in this case, but in any case.” Obama continued, “Nobody is above the law. How many times do I have to say it?”
We need to read the truth according to the super-intel decoding principle of “Thou protests too much.”
Excessive denial accompanied by absolute statements such as “I guarantee” and “how many times do I have to say it” often imply deceit. Obama speaks as the absolute final authority on the matter.
Read through the denials to see his confession: “I guarantee that there is … political influence in any investigation conducted by [my] Justice Department – [especially] in this case, [and] in any case. … I am above the law. How many times do I have to say it?” The facts show Obama has said it many times, speaking often through his actions. The facts show Obama’s DOJ has been significantly politicized – either by direct investigations or refusals to investigate. In fact, Obama has blatantly taken the law into his own hands on numerous occasions.
In this case with Hillary, Obama suggests that his denial is in part a conscious deception. He knows plainly whom he has influenced politically – standard behavior by him. He knows, too, he has operated outside the law.
What he doesn’t know is that his unconscious mind confesses to the real truth by a string of denials – overdoing it – along with two stunning super-intel message markers: a guarantee and a reminder that he has said this numerous times. In essence his unconscious super-intel declares, “I promise you I have confessed to this violation of excessive political influence many times before.” He also fails to appreciate that his words – denials aside – present the exact truth of what he has done.
In another denial, he also suggests he knows full well Hillary violated the law. Later in the interview, Obama emphasized, “I continue to believe that she has not jeopardized America’s national security. Now what I’ve also said is that – and she has acknowledged – that there’s a carelessness, in terms of managing emails.”
It’s another denial confession – “She has jeopardized America’s national security” carelessly – and she knows it. Also, he unconsciously confesses that his comment itself reflects his own carelessness and indifference to national security.
Obama has no idea his super-intel mind communicates the real truth in his denials. He simply thinks he can get away with overt deception. His public statement itself on an ongoing investigation also tells us his denial is a deception and that he considers himself above the law – above the FBI and the DOJ. He undermines the division of powers, telling the courts what to do just as he has repeatedly bypassed Congress. Obama makes plain that he controls the Department of Justice.
More importantly, Obama strongly suggests the DOJ – specifically Attorney General Loretta Lynch – will bend to his political will and refuse to indict Hillary. Seemingly, he’s already anticipating strong reports that straight shooter James Comey, the FBI director, will urge an indictment. If so, Obama will be handicapping Clinton’s presidential bid – which represents a secret self-sabotage and hidden guilt.
The glib Obama buries his pain and his aggression, but deep down his super-intel sees it all.
In a March 23, 2016, article at pjmedia.com, Roger L. Simon stated that the crucial FBI and DOJ investigation of Hillary Clinton was potentially bigger than the Watergate scandal under Nixon. It would determine whether the foundation of America – the rule of law – would remain intact. Citizens had to be convinced. If not, Simon said, America would cease to exist as we know it and decline precipitously. Simon specifically warned Obama to “keep his sticky hands” out of this matter – do not attack the rule of law or “his legacy would be toast.” Intuitively, Simon’s warning suggested exactly what Obama would do.
Day by day, Obama’s true legacy takes one self-inflicted hit after another. Below Obama’s cool, calculated, conscious demeanor lies two tons of secret guilt. Deep down, you don’t do to America what he’s done and get away with it.
Obama’s numerous denial confessions reflect guilt, the need to find the truth he fights and be set free. The Scriptures say, “For the Lord does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). And deep down so does our super-intel’s natural-law moral compass – the new deeper soul in which we all know right from wrong.
Yet Obama’s fixated in his sin – so typical of a severe emotional trauma victim. He can’t give up his payback anger and dictatorial power no matter where it leads. Predictably, Obama as judge himself in overtly insisting Hillary was innocent declared his true legacy: a president continually above the rule of law, continuing to attack the very framework of the United States.
Don’t think that enabling Hilary to skate free couldn’t affect the election and cost Obama even more of his legacy. Then he would also likely help tilt the election to Donald Trump, the one man who called Obama out for breaking the law from the get-go with his unvetted illegal presidency. One last method of self-punishment.
Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., is a psychiatrist and forensic profiler. He is the author of “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear. Secret Fury.” Hodges’ website is “andrewghodges.com.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/obamas-denial-confession-and-secret-guilt/#36hqvjSlWtbTptSw.99